Archive for the ‘General’ Category

ACAS Advice on Disruption Caused by Riots

Friday, August 12th, 2011

The damage resulting from the recent riots in London and other major cities will continue to impact on the lives of those homeowners and businesses caught up in the events for many weeks to come, as well as causing disruption to travel arrangements.

 
The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service has issued an advice sheet for employers and employees on how to cope with the disruption. This states that, in general, it is important to:
 
  • keep in touch with each other – if you can't get to work, try to get in touch with your employer to let them know. If your business has been damaged, contact your employees to discuss work arrangements;
 
  • be flexible about working hours and location, perhaps using smartphones and laptops to help you keep working where possible; and
 
  • be fair – as an employer, try to take into account the circumstances surrounding absence or timekeeping issues before deciding on the action you might take in terms of leave and pay.
 
The guidance, which is available here makes key points on how employees’ entitlement to pay and holiday leave arrangements should be dealt with in such circumstances.
 
If your business has been affected by the recent events and you would like advice on your individual circumstances, contact us without delay.

Public Drains to be Water Company Responsibility

Monday, August 1st, 2011
Many homeowners know, to their cost, that the drains on their property are their responsibility, not that of their local water company. Owners of properties with septic systems will usually know this from the time they acquire the property – those connected to mains drainage often discover this for the first time when there is a problem with their drain.pipes in ditch
 
Although problems with drains are an insurable risk, few homeowners take out such insurance. Worse still, it is often difficult, where a drain crosses adjacent property, to ascertain who is responsible for what. The Government therefore proposes to transfer responsibility for most drains to the water company that provides the local public drainage.
 
It is expected that this change will come into effect in October and the increased cost will be handed on in the form of higher water rates. However, drains whic h are exclusively for one property will remain the responsibility of the occupier of that property within the boundary of the property.
 
How this works is probably best illustrated by looking at the following ‘before and after’ diagram.
 
 
If you have queries about your rights and responsibilities as an occupier of property, contact us for advice.

OFT Offers New Guidance on Competition Law

Thursday, July 28th, 2011

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has made available a package of materials to help businesses comply with competition law. This includes:

 
·        Guidance entitled ‘How Your Business Can Achieve Compliance’;
·        Guidance entitled ‘Company Directors and Competition Law’;
·        a Quick Guide summary of competition law compliance: and
·        a film explaining how competition law works in practice.
 
The resources can be found on the OFT website.
 
An independent survey of over 2,000 businesses, carried out for the OFT, has revealed that awareness of competition law is increasing. 25 per cent of those surveyed said that they know ‘a lot’ or ‘a fair amount’ about competition law. This compares with a figure of 12 per cent in a similar survey conducted in 2006. For larger businesses, the figure was 45 per cent, with only 13 per cent of executives responding that they know ‘nothing’ about competition law.
 
John Fingleton, OFT Chief Executive, said, “Compliance with competition law is essential to ensuring that markets work well for consumers. We recognise that most businesses want to comply with the law and are keen to help them avoid breaching the law in the first place, supporting this by taking strong enforcement action against those who do not comply.”
 
The OFT urges any person with information on cartels, price fixing or abuse of dominance to telephone the cartels hotline on 0800 0851664 or to email cartelshotline@oft.gsi.gov.uk and gives an assurance that information provided will be dealt with in the strictest confidence. The OFT offers financial rewards of up to £100,000 in return for information that assists investigations.

The Bribery Act and Entertainment

Wednesday, July 27th, 2011
The Serious Fraud Office has advised that when considering whether expenditure on corporate hospitality can be considered to be a bribe, it will look at five factors:
  •  Whether or not the organisation has issued a clear policy regarding gifts and hospitality;
  •  Whether the expenditure in question was compliant with the policy and, if not, whether or not it had been sanctioned at the appropriate level within the organisation;
  •  Whether or not  the expenditure was proportionate with regard to the status of the recipient;.
  •   Whether or not the expenditure had been entered in the organisation’s books of account; and
  •   The lawfulness of the receipt by the recipient under the laws of his or her own country.   
We can assist you in setting up a clear anti-bribery policy.

Company Insolvencies to Rise Say PwC

Wednesday, July 20th, 2011

Despite the recent fall in corporate insolvencies, accountants PwC are predicting that company failures will rise during the year as the reductions in real incomes bite on consumer demand.

Liquidation Sale
 
They consider the retail, hospitality and leisure sectors – which rely on discretionary spending and thus are always heavily effected by falling incomes – to be the riskiest sectors.
 
PwC also pint out that the need to refinance debt  poses a significant medium-term problem for many businesses.

Second Company to be Charged With Corporate Manslaughter

Monday, July 18th, 2011

Lion Steel Equipment Ltd is to be charged with manslaughter unde rthe Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act  2007.
Property under construction
The prosecution follows the death of a man who fell through a roof panel. Three of the company’s directors are also to be charged with manslaughter on account of negligence.

 If convicted, the company faces a potentially unlimited fine and the directors possible imprisonment.  
 
 The announcement follows the conviction on appeal of Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings Ltd. earlier this year.

HSE Publishes Latest Fatal Injury Statistics

Sunday, July 17th, 2011

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has released provisional fatal injury statistics for the year April 2010 to March 2011. These show that the number of workers killed in Britain was 171, compared with an all time low of 147 deaths in the previous year. In 2008/09, 178 workers were killed. The rate of fatal injury is now 0.6 per 100,000 workers, up from 0.5 per 100,000 workers the previous year.  

 
The figures show the rate of fatal injuries in several of the key industrial sectors:
 
  • 50 fatal injuries to construction workers were recorded – a rate of 2.4 deaths per 100,000 workers, compared with an average of 61 deaths in the past five years and an increase from the 41 deaths (and rate of 1.9 per 100,000 workers) recorded in 2009/10;
  • 34 fatal injuries to agricultural workers were recorded – a rate of 8.0 deaths per 100,000 workers, compared with an average of 35 deaths in the past five years and a fall from the 39 deaths (and rate of 10.4 per 100,000 workers) recorded in 2009/10; and
  • Nine fatal injuries to waste and recycling workers were recorded – a rate of 8.7 deaths per 100,000 workers, compared with an average of eight deaths in the past five years and an increase from the three deaths (and rate of 2.8 per 100,000 workers) recorded in 2009/10.
 
Judith Hackitt, the HSE Chair, said, “The increase in the number of deaths in the last year is disappointing, after an all time low last year. However, we must remember that we still have one of the lowest rates of fatal injury anywhere in Europe.
 
“The fact that 171 people failed to come home from work to their loved ones last year reminds us all of what we are here to do. It is a stark reminder of the need to ensure that health and safety remains focused on the real risks, which exist in workplaces not on trivia and pointless paperwork.”
 
The 2010/11 figures are provisional. Final statistics will be produced in June 2012, following any necessary adjustments resulting from further investigations.
 

Foster Parents Cannot Prevent Adoption Elsewher

Friday, July 15th, 2011

When children are placed with foster parents, responsibility for them remains with the local council and the council retains the right to remove the children to a new foster home or to other prospective adopters. This right persists even if the foster parents have made an application to adopt a fostered child.

 
The position is laid out clearly enough in the relevant statute, so it was a surprise indeed for Coventry Council when a judge gave foster parents who wished to adopt the children in their care an injunction to prevent the Council from removing them to the home of prospective adopters.
 
In the absence of the Council’s decision to remove the children being shown to be irrational, disproportionate, unlawful or a breach of human rights, it could not be overturned.
 
The Council’s argument that a child is placed for adoption when the decision was made to place them for adoption was not accepted however, the court ruling that a child is placed for adoption when he begins to live with the prospective adopters.
 

Maple Leaf Blues for Mum

Tuesday, July 12th, 2011

Two young children were prevented from being removed to Canada by their mother after the Court of Appeal ruled that to do so would not be in their best interests.

 
The girls’ English father was said to be devoted to them and they spent five nights a fortnight with him following the breakdown of his marriage to his Canadian spouse.
 
The decision will give heart to the many parents who oppose their children being uprooted from the UK and taken to a foreign country by a spouse who wants to start a new life.
 
 

Bribery Act Guidance

Friday, July 1st, 2011

Fift Dollar BillThe Bribery Act 2010 came into force today.



Section 7 of the Act makes it an offence for a commercial organisation to fail to prevent bribery. A business can provide a defence by showing that it had in place adequate procedures to prevent bribery from taking place, however, and the guidance details the approach that should be taken when implementing such procedures. The overriding point is that these should be proportionate in view of the likelihood of bribery occurring, which will depend on the size of the business and the countries and markets in which it operates. Although the principles remain similar to those in the draft guidance, published in September 2010, the advice in the final version is more detailed.

Section 14 of the Act provides that where an offence is committed with the consent or connivance of a senior officer of an organisation, that person (as well as the body corporate or partnership) is guilty of the offence and liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.



Under Section 11 of the Act, the maximum penalty for individuals is 10 years’ imprisonment or an unlimited fine, or both. The maximum penalty for commercial organisations is an unlimited fine.



For information on your responsibilities under the Act, see the quick-start guide on the Ministry of Justice website.